Interhemispheric differences of electroencephalography signal characteristics in different sleep stages.

OBJECTIVE: The current electroencephalography (EEG) measurement setup is complex, laborious to set up, and uncomfortable for patients. We hypothesize that differences in EEG signal characteristics for sleep staging between the left and right hemispheres are negligible; therefore, there is potential to simplify the current measurement setup. We aimed to investigate the technical hemispheric differences in EEG signal characteristics along with electrooculography (EOG) signals during different sleep stages. METHODS: Type II portable polysomnography (PSG) recordings of 50 patients were studied. Amplitudes and power spectral densities (PSDs) of the EEG and EOG signals were compared between the left (C3-M2, F3-M2, O1-M2, and E1-M2) and the right (C4-M1, F4-M1, O2-M1, and E2-M2) hemispheres. Regression analysis was performed to investigate the potential influence of sleep stages on the hemispheric differences in PSDs. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were also employed to calculate the effect size of hemispheres across different frequency bands and sleep stages. RESULTS: The results showed statistically significant differences in signal characteristics between hemispheres, but the absolute differences were minor. The median hemispheric differences in amplitudes were smaller than 3 µv with large interquartile ranges during all sleep stages. The absolute and relative PSD characteristics were highly similar between hemispheres in different sleep stages. Additionally, there were negligible differences in the effect size between hemispheres across all sleep stages. CONCLUSIONS: Technical signal differences between hemispheres were minor across all sleep stages, indicating that both hemispheres contain similar information needed for sleep staging. A reduced measurement setup could be suitable for sleep staging without the loss of relevant information.

Respiratory event index underestimates severity of sleep apnea compared to apnea-hypopnea index.

Polygraphy (PG) is often used to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, it does not use electroencephalography, and therefore cannot estimate sleep time or score arousals and related hypopneas. Consequently, the PG-derived respiratory event index (REI) differs from the polysomnography (PSG)-derived apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). In this study, we comprehensively analyzed the differences between AHI and REI. Conventional AHI and REI were calculated based on total sleep time (TST) and total analyzed time (TAT), respectively, from two different PSG datasets (n = 1561). Moreover, TAT-based AHI (AHITAT) and TST-based REI (REITST) were calculated. These indices were compared keeping AHI as the gold standard. The REI, AHITAT, and REITST were significantly lower than AHI (p < 0.0001, p ≤ 0.002, and p ≤ 0.01, respectively). The total classification accuracy of OSA severity based on REI was 42.1% and 72.8% for two datasets. Based on AHITAT, the accuracies were 68.4% and 85.9%, and based on REITST, they were 65.9% and 88.5% compared to AHI. AHI was most correlated with REITST (r = 0.98 and r = 0.99 for the datasets) and least with REI (r = 0.92 and r = 0.97). Compared to AHI, REI had the largest mean absolute errors (13.9 and 6.7) and REITST the lowest (5.9 and 1.9). REI had the lowest sensitivities (42.1% and 72.8%) and specificities (80.7% and 90.9%) in both datasets. Based on these present results, REI underestimates AHI. Furthermore, these results indicate that arousal-related hypopneas are an important measure for accurately classifying OSA severity.